The potential ban of TikTok in the United States going to the Supreme Court has reignited debates around data privacy, national security, and the regulation of foreign-owned technologies. As the Biden administration,and the incoming Trump administration, review the implications of allowing the Chinese-owned app to operate in the U.S., legal and geopolitical experts emphasize the critical balance between protecting national interests and upholding international trade norms.
Just last week, the Supreme Court issued a writ of certiorari (an order to a lower court to deliver its record in a case so that the higher court may review it) in the case TIKTOK INC. AND BYTEDANCE LTD., v. MERRICK B. GARLAND. The ongoing legal battle surrounding the potential ban of the popular app TikTok highlights critical issues that could reshape the digital marketplace and create new challenges for businesses. With the Supreme Court now set to hear the case, the stakes are high—not just for TikTok, but for international companies that are operating in the United States.
Feras Mousilli, Managing Partner of the law firm Lloyd & Mousilli and an expert in international intellectual property law, notes, “The TikTok controversy is emblematic of a much larger issue—the intersection of national security and global commerce in the digital age. Policymakers must carefully weigh the potential risks posed by foreign-owned tech companies against the principles of free market competition and innovation.”
This article delves into the legal, technological, and international implications of the proposed TikTok ban, exploring how the case could set a precedent for future actions against foreign technology companies.
The Origins of the TikTok Debate
TikTok, a social media platform owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, has become a global sensation, boasting over one billion users worldwide. However, its rapid rise has also drawn scrutiny from governments concerned about data privacy and national security.
The first Trump administration first proposed banning TikTok in 2020, citing concerns that the Chinese government could access the personal data of American users. The administration issued executive orders seeking to block transactions with ByteDance, but these efforts were challenged in U.S. courts and ultimately shelved.
The Biden administration has taken a more measured approach, launching a comprehensive review of the app’s data security practices. However, bipartisan calls for stronger action have intensified, with legislators citing concerns that TikTok’s algorithms could be manipulated to spread propaganda or misinformation. It is expected that the new Trump administration will carry forward the same agenda. “Data sovereignty is at the heart of this debate,” Mousilli explains. “Governments want to ensure that their citizens’ data is not only secure but also free from undue influence by foreign powers.”
Legal Challenges and Questions of Jurisdiction
One of the most contentious aspects of the TikTok ban is the legal framework under which such an action would be enforced. The U.S. government has primarily invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which grants the president broad authority to regulate commerce in response to national security threats. However, experts argue that this approach raises significant legal and constitutional questions.
Mousilli points out, “The use of IEEPA to target a specific app is unprecedented and raises concerns about overreach. If courts determine that such actions lack sufficient evidence of a direct threat, it could set limits on the government’s ability to regulate foreign-owned technology in the future.”
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has also been involved, reviewing ByteDance’s acquisition of the American app Musical.ly (which later became TikTok). In 2020, CFIUS ordered ByteDance to divest TikTok’s U.S. operations, a decision that remains unresolved.
Legal experts highlight the importance of clear and consistent standards for addressing national security concerns in the tech sector. “Without a cohesive legal framework, these cases risk becoming politically charged,” Mousilli warns. “This could deter foreign investment and innovation, ultimately harming the U.S. economy.”
Data Privacy: A Growing Concern
At the core of the TikTok debate is the question of data privacy. Critics argue that ByteDance’s ties to the Chinese government pose an inherent risk, as Chinese law requires companies to cooperate with state intelligence agencies. TikTok has repeatedly denied sharing user data with the Chinese government and has taken steps to address concerns, including storing U.S. user data on servers located in the United States and Singapore.
Despite these assurances, skeptics remain unconvinced. A 2022 report by cybersecurity firm Internet 2.0 claimed that TikTok collects excessive amounts of user data, including location and device information, which could be exploited for surveillance.
“The challenge with data privacy in the digital age is that it’s often impossible to verify where data goes once it’s collected,” Mousilli explains. “Even if TikTok operates independently, the perception of risk can be as damaging as the reality.”
The broader implications of the TikTok case extend to other foreign-owned tech companies, prompting calls for comprehensive data privacy legislation in the U.S. “Without robust federal data protection laws, we’re addressing these issues piecemeal,” Mousilli says. “A clear regulatory framework would provide better guidance for companies and reassurance for consumers.”
Geopolitical Implications
The TikTok controversy is not merely a legal and technological issue; it is also a geopolitical flashpoint in U.S.-China relations. Critics argue that banning TikTok could provoke retaliation from China, potentially escalating tensions in an already fraught trade relationship.
The case has also raised questions about the fairness of targeting specific companies. In 2021, the Chinese government accused the U.S. of using “national security” as a pretext for protectionism, arguing that the TikTok ban violated World Trade Organization (WTO) rules.
Mousilli emphasizes the need for a balanced approach. “The U.S. must demonstrate that its actions are based on legitimate security concerns rather than economic competition. Otherwise, we risk undermining the credibility of international trade norms.”
Some experts suggest that requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok’s U.S. operations to an American company could be a viable compromise, preserving the app’s functionality while addressing security concerns. However, such a move could face resistance from both ByteDance and Chinese regulators.
Beyond regulatory concerns, the case highlights geopolitical risks tied to US-China relations, which could result in supply chain disruptions and trade restrictions. Businesses may need to
diversify supply chains and reduce reliance on specific regions to remain resilient. Lastly, consumer behavior and market dynamics could shift dramatically. If TikTok is restricted, users may migrate to alternative platforms, creating both challenges and opportunities for businesses to adapt their advertising and engagement strategies to stay ahead of the curve.
Implications for Tech Companies and Startups
The TikTok case has significant implications for tech companies and startups operating in an increasingly interconnected world. As governments impose stricter regulations on data privacy and cross-border technology transfers, companies must navigate a complex web of legal and geopolitical risks.
“The tech industry thrives on global collaboration,” Mousilli explains. “Restricting access to markets or technologies can stifle innovation and harm smaller players who lack the resources to adapt.”
Mousilli also highlights the importance of intellectual property protections in this context. “Startups and tech companies must ensure that their intellectual property is safeguarded across jurisdictions. This requires not only legal expertise but also an understanding of the broader geopolitical landscape.”
The TikTok case serves as a wake-up call for businesses navigating today’s complex regulatory and geopolitical landscape. Increased scrutiny around data privacy and security means
companies managing large amounts of user data may face stricter regulations, necessitating significant investments in cybersecurity and compliance. Additionally, the case raises questions about international data transfers, particularly with countries that maintain differing privacy standards, potentially requiring businesses to adjust their data management practices.
Social media platforms are also under the microscope. Enhanced platform regulation and content moderation could lead to greater oversight of algorithms and policies, exposing businesses to
increased liability for user-generated content. For some companies, bans or restrictions on key platforms could disrupt marketing strategies and customer outreach.
A Precedent for the Future
The outcome of the TikTok debate could set a precedent for how the U.S. addresses foreign-owned technology in the future. Legal experts warn that a broad ban could open the door to similar actions against other companies, potentially triggering a cycle of retaliatory measures.
Mousilli concludes, “The TikTok case is a turning point. It forces us to confront the challenges of regulating technology in a globalized world. The decisions made here will shape the future of data privacy, national security, and international trade.”
As policymakers grapple with these complex issues, one thing is clear: the stakes go far beyond a single app. The TikTok controversy is a microcosm of the broader challenges facing the tech industry in the 21st century.
About the Expert
Feras Mousilli is the Managing Partner of Lloyd & Mousilli, a boutique law firm specializing in intellectual property, technology law, and startup legal services. A former in-house counsel at Apple and Dell, Mousilli has extensive experience advising clients on complex legal and regulatory issues across multiple international jurisdictions. Dr. Mousilli is a professor of law and entrepreneurship, who has taught at renowned institutions across four continents, including the University of Texas School of Law, Istanbul University, and the University of California at Berkeley. His insights on the TikTok debate reflect his deep understanding of the intersection between law, technology, and global trade.
Also Read: US Army Bans TikTok for Soldiers on Work Mobile Phones
