Can-Victims-of-An-Airplane-Accident-Get-Compensated-for-Emotional-Trauma-If-They-Did-Not-Get-Injured

Can Victims of An Airplane Accident Get Compensated for Emotional Trauma If They Did Not Get Injured?

Follow Us:

Being involved in an airplane accident can be an extremely traumatic experience, even if you do not sustain any physical injuries. The moments of terror as the plane malfunctions, the panic as it rapidly descends, the horror of the crash landing – these can all lead to severe emotional and psychological distress. 

So can victims of such accidents get compensated for this emotional trauma if they did not get physically hurt? 

Overview of Compensation for Emotional Distress in Airplane Accidents

In general, the law allows recovery of emotional distress damages in airline accident cases only for physical injury victims. However, there are some exceptions. Survivors who were not physically injured may still be able to claim emotional distress compensation if certain conditions are met.

Some key things to know:

  • Compensation depends largely on state laws and the specific circumstances of the case
  • The airline industry is governed by federal regulations which can preempt state laws
  • Emotional distress claims require meeting difficult legal standards

So while it is complex, it is sometimes possible for uninjured victims to receive payouts for trauma suffered in aviation accidents.

Factors That Strengthen Emotional Distress Claims for Uninjured

Though challenging, you may still have a viable emotional distress claim as an uninjured survivor if some additional factors are true in your case:

You Were in the Zone of Danger

If you were close enough to the actual crash to be considered in the “zone of danger,” your mental anguish claim gets stronger. Even though you did not get physically hurt, being in close proximity to the traumatic event can support trauma recovery

Another Family Member Was Killed or Injured

Losing a loved one or seeing them harmed in an accident can compound emotional distress. Mental anguish claims gain more legal traction under these tragic circumstances.

Extreme Negligence Was Involved

If investigations show extreme, willful airline negligence caused the crash, uninjured survivors may have better claims. Specific state laws differ on emotional compensation when gross negligence is a factor. 

You Have Documentation from Mental Health Professionals

Having medical records from psychologists, psychiatrists, counselors, or therapists substantiating your emotional trauma will bolster your claim significantly. So while being uninjured makes distress claims challenging, certain circumstances like these can aid your recovery chances.

Types of Emotional Harm Possible

It is understandable if you are struggling with difficult psychological effects from your airline accident experience. Some common trauma issues that you may have to deal with after an aviation accident include:

  • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder
  • Agoraphobia (fear of flying/traveling)
  • Insomnia, panic attacks, flashbacks of the crash

Anyone involved in an aviation accident who suffers from any of these conditions can sue the airline or any other party that may be responsible for the accident. 

For example, in the Alaska Airlines flight 1282 incident, while only a few passengers suffered physical injuries, it is likely that other passengers suffered from PTSD, anxiety, and other types of emotional trauma as a result of the incident. With a good aviation injury attorney for Alaska Airlines fuselage blowout by their side, such victims can successfully sue the airlines for the emotional impact that the accident might have on their lives. 

Overall, accident survivors deserve compassion and counseling after such an ordeal. And if it can be determined exactly how a disaster has emotionally impacted them, chances are that they can have success claiming compensation from those responsible.

Barriers to Claims for the Uninjured

While a few fortunate exceptions exist, most uninjured survivors unfortunately face considerable challenges getting payouts for stand-alone emotional distress. Hurdles include:

  • Strict application of impact rules – Most states bar recovery without showing physical impact occurred, with narrow exceptions. Even being in close proximity to a deadly crash may not qualify as impact.
  • Causation doubts – Airlines often dispute that emotional trauma in passengers was directly caused by the accident rather than other stress factors in their lives. You must clearly prove the crash itself traumatized you.
  • Precedent against claims – Historically most courts have ruled against airline emotional distress compensation for uninjured passengers. Changing legal viewpoints is an uphill battle.

The bottom line is airlines fiercely resist these kinds of claims, forcing victims to argue intensely just for the possibility of recovery.

Is Making a Claim Still Worthwhile?

With the many roadblocks victims face getting compensated for psychological trauma if they were not physically hurt, is moving forward even advisable? In certain cases, it still may be worthwhile:

If losses are substantial – The impact on your life, livelihood, and personal relationships is so severe that it warrants your best shot at receiving assistive payouts, despite low odds.

To set a precedent to help future cases – If facts are highly favorable, having an attorney push unique arguments could incrementally expand jurisprudence on this issue over time.

When it forces accountability – Airlines may be less motivated to improve safety protocols if they never have to pay out damages for legitimate emotional distress claims. Your claim pressures them.

So carefully weigh whether claiming emotional damages as an uninjured victim has personal, legal, and societal merits that make the attempt sensible for your situation.

Consulting an Experienced Aviation Attorney

Because this area of law is so specialized and evolving, getting trusted legal guidance tailored to the details of your case is vital if pursuing compensation for mental distress as a physically unharmed survivor. 

Key attorney qualities to seek out:

  • Expertise in aviation accident law – Find attorneys concentrating specifically in this niche area rather than general personal injury ones.
  • Track record of big recoveries for clients – Search for counsel with a proven history of large award wins in these very complex airline disputes.
  • Willingness to champion novel legal arguments – Ideal representation will creatively look for ways to maneuver around rigid airline liability laws for clients.
  • Compassion for the trauma you are enduring – This sensitivity to the human, emotional side of the legal battle can determine how relentlessly your attorney fights for you.

An airline disaster can singlehandedly devastate a survivor’s life. Though compensation laws do not always align with people’s continuing struggles, the right aviation law attorney may be able to assist you in recovering damages.

Options Beyond Emotional Distress Claims

Even if an emotional distress claim proves unsuccessful, as is often the case, do know that other help options exist, including:

  • Seeking out specialized therapy and counseling services
  • Applying for government victim compensation funds in applicable cases
  • Accessing advocacy support groups for air accident survivors

So investigate various assistance pathways, both legal and health-oriented, rather than relying solely on uncertain mental anguish claims.

The table below summarizes the key pros and cons of pursuing airline emotional distress claims as an uninjured passenger:

ProsCons
Receive monetary damages to pay for therapeutic careVery high legal standards to meet
Hold airlines financially accountable for negligenceThe low legal precedent of success historically
Deter lax airline safety improvementsComplex area of law – unclear outcomes
Set positive precedent to evolve compensation lawsLengthy, expensive legal process with no guarantee
Public awareness of victims’ hardshipsAirbus often aggressively fights these cases

Conclusion

Navigating the emotional toll and legal options after an airline accident without physical harm can be a dizzying process. The complexity stems from courts historically shielding airlines from rampant lawsuits versus victims arguing for accountability when negligence appears likely.

In the end, while strong claims for uninjured survivors do occasionally succeed and laws inch progressively forward, stringent court thresholds still rightly or wrongly apply. Therefore assess your situation pragmatically before proceeding legally or if insufficiently strong, know other counseling and social support resources are out there to help you heal.

With compassion for all you have endured, do reach out for assistance whether through mental health channels, financial victim funds if applicable, online communities, and the tireless work of passenger rights advocates. 

Also read: Google Flights to show carbon emissions of prospective trips

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best

Scroll to Top

Hire Us To Spread Your Content

Fill this form and we will call you.