All Too-Often, Universities Are Producing People Making Drawings Rather Than Fully-Rounded Engineers
In the evolving landscape of engineering and manufacturing, there is often a gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. This divergence is becoming increasingly evident, as universities produce graduates adept in the abstract dimensions of engineering but sometimes lacking the tangible skills required to navigate the complexities of real-world problem-solving. The issue is arguably not simply about the curriculums, but rather the methodology of education and the broader approach to developing engineering.
The core of the dilemma: our educational institutions are producing individuals proficient in drafting and designing—on paper, or hopefully on screen. However, sometimes they struggle to distinguish between solutions that are theoretically sound and those that are practically feasible. The intricacy of this problem is twofold. There are designs that, while impressive on paper, pose challenges to metal fabricators, welders and mechanics during the assembly or maintenance stages. On the other hand, there are solutions that may initially appear unfeasible to the assembly team but are, in fact, both doable and efficient—provided the engineer can effectively communicate their vision.
This gap between theory and practice is not merely academic; it has implications for the industry. From inefficient designs that complicate assembly processes to potentially innovative solutions dismissed due to communication failures, the consequences are real. The distinction between an actual engineer and a draftsman becomes evident in the ability to not only envision creative solutions but also to bring those solutions to life through a deep understanding of machining processes and effective communication as well.
Addressing this challenge requires a multifaceted approach. Practical workshops at universities should be more than an ancillary part of the curriculum. They should be central to it, providing students with experience of manufacturing’s possibilities and its limitations. Aspiring engineers should be encouraged to engage in hobbies that involve building and tinkering, thereby gaining practical skills and a deeper appreciation for the materials and tools of their trade. These hobbies can serve as a vital bridge between theoretical knowledge and practical application, fostering a deeper understanding of engineering principles through hands-on experience.
Martin Vares, the co-founder and CEO of Fractory, a manufacturing technology company with Design For Engineering solutions built into its pricing and procurement platform, is an advocate of this hands-on, practical approach. Like many people in the manufacturing world, he has many hobbies, chief among them is custom motorbikes. His belief though is that these building hobbies should be started as early as possible. For example, theories about metalworking are fine, but it’s only when actually welding that one learns how metals perform in practice.
He believes the industry might cultivate a culture of collaboration and continuous learning. Engineers should not be isolated from the end-users of their designs or the assembly teams that bring their visions to life. Regular communication between engineers and assembly teams, between designers and builders, along with opportunities for engineers to visit premises and construction sites, can explain the practical challenges faced during the production process, as well as the real-life constraints.
But, bridging the gap between theory and practice in engineering education and professional development is not just about modifying courses or incorporating more workshops. It is about cultivating a mindset of curiosity, continuous learning, and collaboration too. It is about recognizing that engineering is not just a technical discipline but a creative, problem-solving endeavor that requires a deep understanding of the real world it seeks to improve. By embracing practical experiences—through formal education, hobbies, or industry engagement—a new generation of engineers equipped to design and innovate can solve the complex challenges of our time.
Also Read: UC Berkeley Engineers create an agile insect-sized robot
